A newly proposed bill in Mississippi, provocatively titled the “Contraception Begins at Erection Act,” is sparking national debate about reproductive rights, gender accountability, and the politics of contraception. The irony of the proposed bill after the ban against abortion is satirical to say the least. Read more about the bill inside.

The legislation, introduced by a group of progressive lawmakers, would fine men who engage in unprotected sex without demonstrating proof of contraceptive use. The bill, which is largely seen as a response to recent anti-abortion laws passed in Mississippi, aims to shift the focus of reproductive responsibility to include men. Supporters argue that policies targeting women’s reproductive choices disproportionately ignore the role of men in unintended pregnancies. By proposing tangible consequences for men who fail to take precautions during sex, the bill seeks to address this imbalance.

Under the proposed legislation, any man who engages in unprotected sex without using contraception (such as condoms) or who fails to take measures to prevent unintended pregnancy, could face financial penalties up to $10k based upon the infractions. The bill also suggests requiring proof of vasectomy or other contraceptive methods as evidence of compliance.

These policy makers and state reps feel if the government is going to legislate what women can do with their bodies, then men’s contributions to unintended pregnancies should also be legislated.

Critics argue that the bill is symbolic and unlikely to pass in a state with a conservative supermajority. Some see it as political theater meant to highlight the double standards in reproductive legislation.

“This bill is a parody of real governance,” said one Republican lawmaker. “It’s not serious policy—it’s a political stunt.”

Despite the controversy, the bill has ignited important conversations about accountability in reproductive health. Advocates for the legislation argue that it underscores the need for comprehensive sex education, increased access to contraception, and a cultural shift in how society views shared responsibility in family planning.

Whether the “Contraception Begins at Erection Act” becomes law remains to be seen, but its bold approach has succeeded in bringing gender equity in reproductive legislation to the forefront. It also raises questions about how reproductive rights and responsibilities should be shared in an era of heated debates over bodily autonomy.

Comment your thoughts about the proposed bill below.